By AmmoLand Staff - November 2025

Alright, let’s get real for a minute. You’ve probably come across some eye-catching anti-gun stories lately, often citing data from something called the Gun Violence Archive (GVA). But here’s the kicker: that data? It’s pretty much bunk. Yep, made-up numbers dressed up to push a narrative.

Why the Gun Violence Archive Data Doesn’t Hold Up

For anyone who’s serious about gun facts and outdoor shooting sports, relying on GVA is like trusting a weather forecast from a broken compass. Back in 2021, we exposed some serious flaws in their methodology and data collection. Since then, practically no credible researcher, law enforcement agency, or expert in the gun community gives their numbers the time of day.

The Problem with Anti-Gun “Data” Stories

Here’s the thing: when folks, especially prominent anti-gun doctors, base their stories on faulty data, it doesn’t just lead to misinformation—it fuels policy debates that don’t reflect reality. If you’re out hunting, practicing at the range, or just keeping your gun gear in check, you want truth and accuracy, not fiction masked as science.

What We Recommend Instead

Stick with sources that respect facts and real-world evidence. Whether you’re researching gun safety, outdoor sports, or hunting stats, look for data from vetted organizations and government reports. That way, your knowledge stays sharp, your gear stays ready, and your outdoor adventures stay fun and safe.

Bottom Line

Don’t get fooled by flashy headlines backed by shaky data. The Gun Violence Archive’s numbers are unreliable, and anyone serious about guns knows it. Keep your info solid, your ammo reliable, and your weekend hikes or range days stress-free.