A three-judge panel from the Oregon Court of Appeals has unanimously upheld Measure 114, a contentious gun control law passed by voters in November 2022. This measure, which faced immediate legal challenges, was previously ruled unconstitutional by a Harney County Circuit Judge. However, the appeals court's decision has sparked significant reactions from both gun rights advocates and proponents of the measure.
Attorney Tony Aiello, representing gun rights plaintiffs, expressed disappointment, stating that the ruling effectively criminalizes millions of Oregonians by infringing on their right to bear arms. He indicated plans to appeal to the Oregon Supreme Court, emphasizing the need for continued public support in this legal battle.
In contrast, Jess Marks, executive director of the Alliance for a Safe Oregon, celebrated the ruling as a victory for public safety, highlighting the efforts of Oregonians who campaigned for the measure. Measure 114 mandates a permit to acquire firearms, requires background checks, and limits magazine capacity to 10 rounds for civilians, while exempting law enforcement.
Federal courts have also weighed in, with a ruling affirming the measure's constitutionality under the Second Amendment, stating that large-capacity magazines are not essential for self-defense. The appeals court's decision reinforces the notion that the right to bear arms is not absolute and can be regulated to promote public safety.
As the legal battles continue, the implications of Measure 114 will likely resonate throughout Oregon and beyond, shaping the ongoing discourse around gun rights and regulations in the United States.